Re[2]: Quorum (Re: [ga] CORRECTION!!!)

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Kent,

Monday, March 26, 2001, 7:50:42 AM, Kent Crispin wrote:
> I use the word "useless" to describe the "rule", because under this
> "rule", precisely one voter can pass a resolution, and no reasonable
> person from the NC or the Board or anywhere else is going to give any
> weight whatsoever to a "resolution" supported only by a single vote.

> Therefore, one still must go back and analyze any vote to determine the
> level of support it had, to decide if the result should be given any
> weight.  Hence the "rule" has no significance.


Funny how this comes out only when a consensus that is against an
ICANN policy is adopted.

I'd give Kent and Dave credibility if they would just a few times be
against something ICANN has proposed or is doing.

And if they would stop trying to discredit a consensus simply because
it is against an ICANN policy or proposal.


-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html