ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Re[8]: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract


David Farrar wrote:
>
>On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:33:54 -0800, you [Dave Crocker] wrote:
>
> >At 03:42 AM 3/28/2001, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> >>In favour of the change of the charter of .org: 0
> >
> >Has anyone noticed that the subject line does not match the focus of
> >discussion?
> >
> >That's not a minor matter of bookkeeping.  It underscores a missed 
>opportunity.
> >
> >The Verisign contract alternative does not mandate any change in the
> >charter of .org.
> >
> >People have spent essentially all of their time arguing about a matter 
>that
> >is not part of the contract consideration and have literally ignored the
> >major features that ARE subject to change by the alternative contract.
>
>I think you should say "some people".  For my part I have hardly
>mentioned the *.org issue at all and have on many occasions debated
>the significant features of the proposed agreements.

May I confirm David Farrar's comment.
In my message, few lines after the line quoted by Dave Crocker, I gave the 
list of the 34 members who participated in the discussion without mentioning 
the .org charter.
Incidentally, the discussion on the .org charter is getting weight now, that 
our output has been already given to NC, and that NC has already given its 
output to ICANN.
At this point in time, the matter is in order, methinks.

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>