RE: Re[2]: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

I do appreciate your post, William. I just wanted to note that I was
abstaining and why. I understand the point you are making and respect it...

It seemed to me that the process suggested would leave it to the community
of stakeholders to express their input. This immediate process seems to me
to be in advance of that future "suggested" process; and this process can
show some early view of where some are.

:-)


-----Original Message-----
From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 8:24 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Cc: Roberto Gaetano; ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract


Hello Marilyn,

Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 4:37:23 PM, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:


> I'm not voting in this particular round.  If there had been an option to
> have the community undertake an indepth consideration of the charter, I
> would have supported that. It's possible the  outcome would be the same
but
> I can't forecast.  In the meantime, please show me, therefore as
"abstain". 

I think the principle is if a change in policy is appropriate to even
consider for TLD that has been in use so long.

Obviously the sense of most of us is absolutely not, under any
circumstances.

The harm to the internet community, and to domain name holders, is way
too much to even make this something that should ever be reasonably
considered.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html