Re: [ga] Candidate Questions

[Eric Dierker <Eric@hi-tek.com>]

I wish I said that!!

Joanna Lane wrote:

> Eric Dierker wrote:-
>  think of it do we need a chair that is
> connected upwards or one that is connected downwards.
>
> [Joanna] Hi Eric,
> The right answer is *both*. Personally, I'd like to see all four candidates
> in the future development of the GA. This is an organization setting itself
> up to represent millions of Internet stakeholders, all stakeholders, not
> just those that ICANN recognizes currently through it's existing NC and
> Constituency structure. Let's face it, running the GA is not a hobby. Until
> such time as folks with interests in TLDA, .ORG, Multilingualism, Outreach
> and Education, Individuals, Small business, and others, are recognized by
> ICANN's SO as part of the consensus building process, it is the duty of the
> incoming GA Chair to be all inclusive to those viewpoints in its output. For
> the GA Chair to delegate particular responsibilities to members who have
> identified themselves with particular topics, seems to me a sensible policy.
>
> Sincerely,
> Joanna

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html