Re[3]: [ga] Sanctions

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Also, the message you linked to states:

"I am recommending the list administrator to limit the maximum number of
messages that any subscriber can send per day to 5."

This was a recommendation to the list administrator to come up with a
way to limit the posts, NOT a call to the list membership to limit
their posts.

Your action is without merit.


Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 7:05:35 PM, William X. Walsh wrote:

> Hello Harald,

> Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 6:33:38 PM, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

>> At 17:35 17.04.2001 -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
>>>Hello Danny,
>>>
>>>BTW, you are wrong in your interpretation of the rules.
>>>
>>>You are required to issue a call for a limit of posts before there can
>>>be any such violation.
>>>
>>>You have issued no such call.
>>>
>>>"If the GA Chair or a list monitor asks for a limit to the nuber[sic] of 
>>>posts per person per day, this must be respected"
>>>
>>>The rule is only in effect if you have issued a call for such a limit.
>>>
>>>I have searched the archives to find such a call, to no avail.

>> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc03/msg01536.html

>> The idea that a limit disappears when the chair is changed is fallacious.

> Without commenting on the merit of your interpretation above, which I
> do not agree with, the assertion that a call that is over 60 days old
> is still in effect is fallacious.





-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html