Re: [ga] Appendix U

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

At 22:24 30.04.2001 -0700, Bret Fausett wrote:
>Kent Crispin wrote:
> > We can either delay now while the DNSO grinds through several months of
> > inconclusive rambling, or we can delay later while the confidentiality
> > clauses tick away.
>
>I don't see months of rambling as an option. These contracts will be
>revised, or not, in the next week. I'd rather see the confidentiality delays
>fixed now than left in. I read in Danny's message that he fully appreciated
>the time pressures on this.

Note that the most long-lasting confidentiality requirement in the Afilias 
contract (the one I checked) is 18 months, and covers ONLY reports that 
reveal how much money they used for advertising (sections 2.1 and 4.4).

I think a fair amount of evaluation can be done without this info.



>        -- Bret
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html