[ga] Demarcation Between Review and External Relationships Lists

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@corliss.net>]

On Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:01 PM (AEST), Harald wrote:

> What is the delimiter between ga-ext and ga-review?
>
> My immediate reaction to the agenda below is that it seems more
appropriate
> to  ga-review; "Department of Commerce (DoC) mandate" seems hardly
relevant
> to the relationship betweeen the General Assembly and the world.

Thank you, Harald.  I agree that the External Relationships list is more
relevant to the relationships between the General Assembly and the rest of
the world.

I wonder, perhaps, if we could get some feedback from the Chair and those
involved in the review as to the proper demarcation between the two lists.

Best regards
Patrick Corliss


At 01:25 01.05.2001 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
>External Relationships:  To consider, build and enhance the General
>Assembly's relationship with all external parties including, but not
limited
>to, the ICANN Board, ICANN as a body, the Names Council, other Supporting
>Organizations, other internet organizations and the general public.

POSSIBLE AGENDA

(1)    ICANN as an Organisation
Board of Directors, CEI & Staff
Committees of the Board of Directors
ICANN mission - technical or regulatory?
ICANN as a Non-Profit, Articles & By-Laws
Accounts, audit, finance & funding
Structure, membership & accountability

(2)    Oversight & Corporate Governance
Role & Jurisdiction of US Government
Department of Commerce (DoC) mandate
Congresss and oversight of ICANN
Monopoly, anti-trust & internet control
ICANNWatch & other critiques

(3)    Past & Present Advisory Committees
At Large Membership Study Committee (ALSC)
Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)
DNS Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC)
Membership Advisory Committee (MAC)
Advisory Committee on Independent Review (IRAC)

(4)    Corporate Policies
Conflicts of Interest Policy
Independent Review Policy
Reconsideration Policy

(5)    Policy, Strategy & Consensus Process
ICANN website & Public Comment Forum
Names Council-DNSO relationship
Outreach, participation, translations, education
Emerging constituencies & the public
Membership Implementation Task Force (MITF)
ICANN's relationship with govts & ccTLDs

(6)    Contracts and Agreements
ICANN-Verisign Registry Agreement (.com, net & org)
ICANN-DoC Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)
Cooperative Research & Development Agreement (CRADA)
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
IANA ccTLD Delegation Practices Document
Registrar Accreditation Agreements, etc.
ARIN-Verisign Core DNS Support

(7)    Supporting Organisations
Address Supporting Organisation (ASO)
Domain Name Supporting Organisation (DNSO)
Protocol Supporting Organisation (PSO)

(8)    ASO =>>      Regional Internet Registries
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
Réseaux IP Européens (RIPE) Network Co-ordination Centre
Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC)

(9)    DNSO =>>    Constituencies
Business Constituency
Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders (NCDNHC)
Country Code Top Level Domain (ccTLD) Registries
Generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) Registries
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) Constituency
ICANN Accredited Registrars Constituency
Intellectual Property (IP) Constituency

(10)    PSO =>>        Organisations
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI)

(11)    Other Related Bodies
Berkman Center for Internet & Society
World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)

Best regards
Patrick Corliss
Co-Chair, DNSO GA



--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html