RE: [ga] Appendix U

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

I don't necessarily disagree with you on that point and as you know I don't
have anything to do with Appendix U because we do not have one.  But isn't
it possible that some information that is confidential could be used to
reach conclusions which then could be communicated publicly without
disclosing the specific information?

In my mind, it isn't at all clear that the fact that some information
submitted for evaluation purposes is confidential necessarily needs to delay
the evaluation process and therefore the possible introduction of additional
TLDs.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Bret Fausett [mailto:baf@fausett.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 12:38 PM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Appendix U


Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> It seems to me that your conclusion is true only if the "one piece of
> information" in question is critical to the evaluation and if the
evaluation
> cannot be completed without publicly disclosing the "one piece of
> information."

But if it's not critical to the evaluation, it ought to be deleted from
Appendix U altogether. If I'm wrong, I'd appreciate seeing a better
schedule, with an explanation of how we're going to complete the evaluation
process and make second round selections without all the data.

          -- Bret

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html