ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] MOTION - "In Favour" or "Opposed" ???


Hi Chuck:
I have take some time to read the ByLaws again and this is what it says:

"Any group of individual or entities may petition to the Board for
recognition as a new or separte Constituency.  Any such petition will be posted for public
comment pursuant the article III, section 3.  The Board may create new
constituencies in responses to such a petition, or on its own motion, if
it determines that such action would serve the purposes of the
Corporation.  In the even that the Board is considering action on its own
motion it shall post a detailes explanation of why such action is
necessary or desirable, set a reasonable time for public comment, and not
make  final decision on whether to create such new constituency until
after reviewing all comments received.  Whenever the Board posts a
petition or recommendation for a new consituency for public comment, it
will notify the Names Council and will consider any response to that
notification prior taking action"

This By-Laws give the right to any group of individuals to make a request
for a new consituency.  Then ICANN has the obligation to put it for Public
Comments, according to the same By-Laws.

If there are not any special procedure to request for a new constituency I
just have to say that...lets do it again...lets request formally again for
a new constituency!  Lets deliver to the ICANN Board formal requests for a
new consituency!

Best Regards
Vany

Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
IT Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
Fax: (507) 230-3455
e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
http://www.sdnp.org.pa


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>