Re: [ga] MOTION - "In Favour" or "Opposed" ???

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Vany and all assembly members,

Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales wrote:

> Hi Chuck:
> I have take some time to read the ByLaws again and this is what it says:
>
> "Any group of individual or entities may petition to the Board for
> recognition as a new or separte Constituency.  Any such petition will be posted for public
> comment pursuant the article III, section 3.  The Board may create new
> constituencies in responses to such a petition, or on its own motion, if
> it determines that such action would serve the purposes of the
> Corporation.

  This is the salient part of this section (Section 3).  A constituency
in it's proper form is not necessarily to serve a corporation.

>  In the even that the Board is considering action on its own
> motion it shall post a detailes explanation of why such action is
> necessary or desirable, set a reasonable time for public comment, and not
> make  final decision on whether to create such new constituency until
> after reviewing all comments received.  Whenever the Board posts a
> petition or recommendation for a new consituency for public comment, it
> will notify the Names Council and will consider any response to that
> notification prior taking action"
>
> This By-Laws give the right to any group of individuals to make a request
> for a new consituency.  Then ICANN has the obligation to put it for Public
> Comments, according to the same By-Laws.

 And this has already been done with respect to the IDNO/IDNH...

>
>
> If there are not any special procedure to request for a new constituency I
> just have to say that...lets do it again...lets request formally again for
> a new constituency!  Lets deliver to the ICANN Board formal requests for a
> new consituency!

  Well this is fine, but why repeat the same thing over and over again...???
The Board has made it clear that it is not interested in individual domain
name owners opinion or input.  The ICANN BOD has decidedly determined
that it is not interested in +80% of the Domain name holders/stakeholders.
The ICANN BoD has decidedly also not to provide for a @large as also
is required.

>
>
> Best Regards
> Vany
>
> Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
> IT Specialist
> Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
> Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
> Fax: (507) 230-3455
> e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
> http://www.sdnp.org.pa
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html