Re: [ga] Reply to Jefsey

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Danny,

May I suggest that we all have debated these issues both privately and
publicly.  Before you cast stones about breach of rules of decorum review that
you complained about the methodology yourself and that you cast the first stone
against Patrick during your election. You youself have sidestepped the great
DNSO protocol by reporting your version of the wg-review directly rather than
accepting your then chair Burton's report. Now you are a chair and you decry
just what you did when you disagreed with the chair.
How far from a branch can an apple fall, before it's seed takes root and it
becomes a tree.  Do not use your power to crush opposition as you fought against
in the wg-review.

As your servant,

"babybows.com" wrote:

> Jefsey,
>
> You have stated on another list, "IMHO we do not really need any iCANN at
> all."  "Dont fight the iCANN, replace it."
>
> Your declared agenda has been noted.  Your support of members that have been
> sanctioned for a breach of the rules of decorum of this list is noted.  Your
> relentless attacks against the Chair and Alternate Chair of the General
> Assembly are also noted.
>
> You, of course, are at liberty to continue to harangue against ICANN.  This
> is an open forum.  I will not, however, support your recent initiatives that
> are, in my opinion, designed to disrupt the ICANN process.   Your motion is
> denied.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html