<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] 2001-2002 Budget
- To: william@userfriendly.com, webmaster@babybows.com, "Roberto Gaetano" <ga_list@hotmail.com>
- Subject: Re: [ga] 2001-2002 Budget
- From: "L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 18:29:58 -0500
- CC: ga@dnso.org, rob@echelon.ca, mruppert@bulkregister.com, jtai@dotster.com, pdeblanc@usvi.net, cgomes@verisign.com, jcohen@shapirocohen.com, helmut.schink@icn.siemens.de, linda@icann.org
- In-reply-to: <F87SAW4eE2FGwQ21ju2000046b1@hotmail.com>
- Reply-to: jandl@jandl.com
- Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
I think the issue has, in fact, been discussed by many on the GA list
and it is definitely an area of concern that we should all address. I see
no reason why our Chair should have refrained from sending this
message.
Leah
On 14 May 2001, at 21:36, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> William,
>
> You wrote:
> >
> >Thursday, May 10, 2001, 11:45:30 PM, Danny Younger wrote:
> >
> > > To the members of the Budget Group and Finance Committee:
> >
> > > The membership of the General Assembly understands that you have
> > > advised
> >the
> > > President of ICANN with respect to the proposed budget for 2001-2002.
> >We
> > > are concerned by published reports that this proposed budget has not
> > > allocated any funds for At-Large Elections, in spite of past promises
> > > to choose at least five more Board members through this electoral
> > > process.
> >We
> > > would appreciate the benefit of your thoughts on this matter.
> >
> >The GA has not expressed any such concern.
> >
> >I suggest that the GA Chair should not indicate to be speaking for the GA
> >unless he has the expressed support from the GA for that statement.
> >
> >In this case, he speaks only for himself, and his comments should be
> >given only that weight as they would from any one individual.
>
>
> While I agree on the fact that the GA has not taken a formal position on
> the issue, I believe that the Chair can, on urgent matters, express his
> sense of the Assembly, pending verification in the short term.
>
> It all depends: if the Chair feels that the GA does not have an opinion on
> the matter, you are right, he should speak as an individual. If, OTOH, he
> feels that this is the position of the GA, he should confirm his message,
> and rapidely call a straw poll of the GA in support of this position.
>
> Regards
> Roberto
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|