RE: [ga] Joop's motions

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Other SOs and the @Large are out of scope for the DNSO.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William S. Lovell [mailto:wsl@cerebalaw.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 10:20 AM
> To: jandl@jandl.com; ga@DNSO.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] Joop's motions
> 
> 
> I see it as being pertinent, and Leah has the right answer.
> I also think it would be good to kick start the @large.
> Although strictly speaking the needs of "mere users" --
> not a pejorative term -- don't fall under the aegis of the
> DNSO, nevertheless the DNSO does have to concern
> itself with its relationships with other SOs, the @large,
> and on up.
> 
> L Gallegos wrote:
> 
> >
> > > I would not recommend, for the time being, to create a 
> separate SO for
> > > users, but to encourage the users that may feel the 
> interest to participate
> > > in the existing ones.
> >
> > Which ones, Roberto?  Isn't that the point?  There are no SO's where
> > they fit.  There would be the @large if it existed.  IMO, 
> that is the place
> > for users to have input.  It would need to be organized and 
> recognized,
> > of course and this is precisely the point about which Danny 
> wrote in his
> > message.  IMO, it is very pertinent to the GA discussions.
> >
> > Leah
> >
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html