ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Joop's motions


Leah,

You wrote:
>On 14 May 2001, at 21:52, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> > I would not recommend, for the time being, to create a separate SO for
> > users, but to encourage the users that may feel the interest to 
>participate
> > in the existing ones.
>
>Which ones, Roberto?  Isn't that the point?  There are no SO's where
>they fit.  There would be the @large if it existed.  IMO, that is the place
>for users to have input.  It would need to be organized and recognized,
>of course and this is precisely the point about which Danny wrote in his
>message.  IMO, it is very pertinent to the GA discussions.


Sorry, I was less clear than I thought.
My argument was in favour of user participation in the supporting 
organizations, and, inter alia, the DNSO.
How? First answer: the GA. Second answer: possibly a constituency.
For the other SOs, I would assume the similar would hold, but it is 
something that will be discussed elsewhere.
Bill Lowell raised the point of the AtLarge: indeed there's room there, but 
there is still a lot of work to do to build a more permanent structure that 
will allow AtLarge members to communicate.

Last but not least, of course this subject is pertinent to the GA 
discussions - I would never had taken the risk of being suspended for 
out-of-scope posting ;>)

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>