Re: [ga-roots] [ga] Gigalaw poll on "domain names not sanctioned by ICANN"

["William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>]

Those were the only two -- yea or nay.  I was asked if there
was any indication of the size of the sample population, so
I've asked Gigalaw about that and will pass on whatever
I hear.

(Actually, I  should probably have started this in [ga-roots]
because collisions and alternative roots, etc., are really what
it's all about. The question may really have meant roots, TLDs,
or whatever, although the broader term domain names was in
fact used -- by "broader" in this context I mean simply that a
domain name involves all that to the left of the dot as well as
the TLD.)

Bill Lovell

Sandy Harris wrote:

> Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>
> > >  The question was "What do you think of domain names not sanctioned by
> > >ICANN?"
> > >
> > >56.4% say they "threaten the stability of the Internet."
> > >
> > >43.59% say they "foster healthy competition."
> > >
> >
> > Any indication on what the population was?
> > I mean, were they maily lawyers? Technical people? Commercial people?Average
> > users?
>
> Were those the only two answers allowed? It appears so, since the percentages
> sum to almost exactly 100.
>
> Remove the word "healthy" and my answer would definitely be "both the above".
>
> Leave it in, or even replace it with "necessary" or "vital", and I'd still be
> inclined to give that answer.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html