RE: [ga] the NC takes the next step

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

I'm a little anxious that we don't have our own house in order but are
making requests from the ccTLDs.  ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:19 AM
To: Joop Teernstra; Jefsey Morfin; ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] the NC takes the next step


on 6/5/01 9:22 PM, Joop Teernstra at terastra@terabytz.co.nz wrote:

> At 11:03 5/06/01 +0200, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>> Will the ccTLDs attend?
> 
> Since they have decided to withdraw from the DNSO , I doubt it.
> 
> But if they want to become an SO in their own right, they may well decide
> on some form of DN holder representation from within their own customer
base.
> 
> It would do much for their credibility as a country-oriented "shadow
DNSO".
> 

The argument to that is that there is a fundamental conflict of interest for
the ccTLDSO to represent both themselves and their client. If the ccTLDs
represent 244 countries and each has 1 vote on an issue, how many votes do
registrants have? The balance of power has to be created by a separate SO
for registrants, so that the ccTLDSO vote and the RegsitrantSO is
commensurate, one vote each. I would like to hear from the ccTLDs on this
issue.

Regards,
Joanna 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html