Re: [ga] the NC takes the next step

[Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

on 6/6/01 11:41 PM, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA at mcade@att.com wrote:

> 
> I'm a little anxious that we don't have our own house in order but are
> making requests from the ccTLDs.  ?

Marilyn,
The ccTLDs have changed the DNSO map. First, we need to be clear about what
impact the new SO could have on the DNSO, and that is something they will
have considered very carefully when making their decision.

As an individual, I am impacted by the withdrawal of the ccTLDs, because it
makes a nonsense for the proposed DNSO-IDNH Constituency to now represent
the interests of ccTLD registrants. If you want to talk about putting the
DNSO house in order first, that's fine, but from the registrant's
perspective, it is now only half a house.

While the ccSO may not concern you Marilyn, others need to know what, if
any, steps are going to be taken by them with respect to representation of
individual registrants within ICANN. If none, then we have a serious problem
to solve on behalf of individual ccTLD Domain Name holders that may require
direct and confidential consultations with the new ccTLDs SO, outside of
this forum.

The bottom line is that if the ccTLDs can leave DNSO and still obtain a
place at the ICANN table, so can others, and no doubt you will agree that
DNSO has a record of intransigentism when the subject of giving individuals
the vote is raised.
 

Regards,
Joanna


> 
> on 6/5/01 9:22 PM, Joop Teernstra at terastra@terabytz.co.nz wrote:
> 
>> At 11:03 5/06/01 +0200, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>>> Will the ccTLDs attend?
>> 
>> Since they have decided to withdraw from the DNSO , I doubt it.
>> 
>> But if they want to become an SO in their own right, they may well decide
>> on some form of DN holder representation from within their own customer
> base.
>> 
>> It would do much for their credibility as a country-oriented "shadow
> DNSO".
>> 
> 
> The argument to that is that there is a fundamental conflict of interest for
> the ccTLDSO to represent both themselves and their client. If the ccTLDs
> represent 244 countries and each has 1 vote on an issue, how many votes do
> registrants have? The balance of power has to be created by a separate SO
> for registrants, so that the ccTLDSO vote and the RegsitrantSO is
> commensurate, one vote each. I would like to hear from the ccTLDs on this
> issue.
> 
> Regards,
> Joanna 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html