[ga] Re: [ga-udrp] the UDRP

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Ross,
This would certainly be of real interest, as the rights/risks of the IDNHs 
have not been worked in cooperation with a Registrar and there is room for 
an insurance solution against errors/bugs as the one quoted or similars (on 
the Registrar as well as on the Holder side).
Jefsey




On 12:19 15/06/01, Ross Wm. Rader said:


> > That would be registrars can decide what ever they want.  I cannot
> > figure who you protect by not publishing the full name.  There is only
> > one reasonable explanation for this type of situation.
>
>I can't speak for all other registrars, but Tucows leeway on matters like
>this are very limited and certainly not the equivalent of "whatever we
>want".
>
>If anyone is interested in facts, I can probably get Karen to work up a list
>of exactly what our leeway is.
>
>Let me know.
>
>-rwr
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga-udrp@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga-udrp" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html