ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] DNSO GA Chair Employed by Register.com?


Dear Derek,
I cannot yet again be labelled a pro-Danny :-). As it is not easy to 
respond such legitimate mail as yours: so I hope Danny will accept that I 
prompt the following comment.

Danny never hidden he had several different jobs [he detailed] before 
creating his own company with his wife and he is moonlighting at Register 
Inc. in no politically involved position. Jeff is not disclosing anything, 
just alluding to Danny's candidacy presentation.

Several praised Danny for his contribution in Stockholm. Myself I never 
faught Danny for what he is but for his present style, IMHO detrimental to 
the GA and to himself. He will be someone to count with, once he has found 
his Chairman style (not easy as yourself discovered it this week ;-) ).

Would Registers Inc. take notice of such an employee and promote him, this 
would be a good point for them and I would certainly not object. Would 
Danny have this possiblity or others in mind this would certainly be a plus 
in my mind. Would him personnally share Registers points of view as a new 
comer learning a new trade through his colleagues at Registers, this would 
seem natural. I note that Danny's style seems to have "improved" a lot 
since Stockholm: experience are the mistakes of cute people having memory 
and the people he may share them with.

Ambition is far more secure a mobile and an agenda for one person's 
partners than nobility. Danny never hidden his position: I am sure would it 
substantially change he would let it us know (it is his interest). With any 
ambitious and capable man, the concern is more the target than the current 
alliances.

BTW I am quite interested in learning that you are an owner in DNs and 
ISPs. We all have our interests and ownerships, and we are all grown boys 
with our agendas. This is what makes the GA interesting as Marilyn 
explained it yesterday. But knowing better each other helps a more 
efficient debate.

Cheers. Jefsey

On 15:18 15/06/01, Derek Conant said:
>Danny,
>
>I have come across a recent GA post that states that you are an employee
>of Register.com.
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc07/msg03228.html
>
>You indicated to me in Stockholm that you do not have any business
>association, whatsoever, with any Internet business.  You indicated to
>me that you own a company that produces bows for babies (baby bows).
>You indicated to me that you are a family man with limited financial
>resources and that you funded your trip to Stockholm.  You indicated to
>me that you are not funded for you efforts at ICANN and that your only
>interest in participating in the ICANN process is for a noble effort.
>
>Is it true that you are employed by Register.com?
>
>If you are employed by Register.com, then I can only guess that a deal
>must have been cut with you after your representations to me at
>Stockholm.  If you are employed by Register.com, I question your motives
>with the representations you made to me in Stockholm.
>
>I am an owner in domain name registration businesses and several ISP
>companies.
>
>I won't know what to think if you are in fact working for Register.com.
>
>Derek Conant
>DNSGA President and Chairman
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>