Re: [ga] Edelman's report on BIZ

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Thank you very much for this post,

I will reach Millions with this news of none collision.  I have been studying
hard to understand this problem as there are many everywhere that are
worried. I cannot express deeply enough our thanks to you and Mr. Probst for
your timely and patient explanation of these matters which families and
especially small businesses without the resources to over redundancy their
e-commerce access and over direct their ISPs really rely.  You fine men may
not have the dayley contact that I do with the working masses, they spend a
year's barrowed money on access and then they hear it will not work in some
news release from ICANN and husbands and wives sit around the dinner table
and worry for their childrens college education.  We are the families that
put trust in your ability to assure that our lifes investment works. It is
easy to laugh at my over emotionalism but I assure you it is not easy to sit
at that table and convince a suicidal that the dotCOM failure was not his
fault.

You men are playing with some serious life stuff here and I for one
appreciate you efforts.

Rock on Bros
Eric


Jim Fleming wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>
> >
> > But if the registrations were made afterwards, in full knowledge of
> > the fact that they will not be in the ICANN root and may even conflict
> > with a much more powerful and global business, I am wondering what
> > conclusion to draw.
> >
>
> It might be helpful to have some understanding of how DNS works.
> It is unfortunate that URL forwarding and domain name parking have
> removed users from the details. In the past, users were more familiar
> that an SLD.TLD registration meant that they supplied 2 (two) nameservers
> to be handle that zone. Ultimately, the goal is to have DNS queries
> for names under SLD.TLD to be routed to those 2 nameservers.
>
> Does it matter how the 2 SLD.TLD nameservers are located ?
> Are TLD Clusters required ?....to locate the 2 SLD.TLD nameservers ?
> If one asks one TLD Cluster and gets the same answer as another
> TLD Cluster, does it matter ?
>
> One conclusion could be that users are willing to register in TWO
> TLD Clusters to make sure their 2 SLD.TLD nameservers are located.
> This could result in TWO Registry operations, two fees, etc. Some
> may see this redundant TLD Cluster as more reliable, if properly
> operated.
>
> The Dual-TLD-Cluster proof-of-concept work is on-going.
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12215.html
> "Proof of Concept TLD Development...and Multiple TLD Clusters"
>
> It would seem in the .BIZ case that TWO TLD Clusters could be
> operated and all SLD.BIZ owners would be encouraged to register
> with both. In order to do that, they both have to be operational.
> People can not register with a Registry that does not exist.
>
> Where are the operational IPv4 .BIZ Registries ?
> How many are there ?
> Which are the "best-of-breed" ?
>
> Is the U.S. Government publishing the SLD.BIZ names from its
> proof-of-concept IP Claims trials on a daily basis ?
> Should those names then feed into the .BIZ Registries ?
> ...to make SLD.BIZ names work...
>
> Are people focused on making SLD.BIZ names work ?
>
> Jim Fleming
> http://www.DOT-NZ.com
> http://www.DOT-BIZ.com
> 0:212 - BIZ World
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html