ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency


Here I am for any opposed.

Please feel free to post to me any way you want.  I will catalog and
report the nay sayers.

Let us give it a few more days and then call a consensus!

Sincerely,
Eric

Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:

> > --- Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >A rough blanket statement of the broad objectives
> > > of the Individual Registrants
> > > > >Constituency (IRC) might be as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > >"Mission:  To effect and ensure the recognition,
> > > representation, and input of
> > > > >Individual Registrants of Domain Names as bona
> > > fide stakeholders in the Domain
> > > > >Name System (DNS), through an established and
> > > direct voice in all ICANN policy
> > > > >formulation bodies and functions."
>
> So far we have:
>
> Myself (Sotiris Sotiropoulos)
> Joop Teernstra
> David Farrar
> Joanna Lane
> Eric Dierker
> Jason Graf
>
> Anybody else?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>