RE: [ga] Additional Questions for our Board Candidates

[Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales <vany@sdnp.org.pa>]

HI Marilyn, Dany and all:

I am fully agree with Marilyn.

However, anyone is free to make questions
to potential candidates if this helps to anyone to endorse or not endorse
certain nominees, if they want.

And if Names Council members wish to take in count such answer, also is up
to anyone of them (including me) and make additional questions or even
make the same quiestions to those that receives enough endorsement to be
considered in this election.

Best Regards
Vany

 On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
wrote:

> Danny, could I ask that we slow down just a bit and allow the endorsement
> period to get started before demanding responses. I am sure that the
> candidates will be responsive to an organized approach to consult with the
> constituencies and GA.
>
> However, I note that the nomination phase just closed, and we are now in
> endorsement phase. Perhaps we could let that play out a few days since that
> will be a useful exercise in and of itself.
>
> I understand that some may feel that they need to ask questions before
> endorsing, of course, so I am merely suggesting that we, the  GA, give it a
> few days before appearing to set deadlines, or appear critical of the
> candidates for not responding immediately.
>
> Marilyn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 11:24 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Cc: ejonvel@ej.net; Paul.Kane@reacto.com; jefsey@wanadoo.fr; jo-uk@rcn.com;
> Amadeu@nominalia.com
> Subject: [ga] Additional Questions for our Board Candidates
>
>
> It's time that we started hearing from our Board candidates.   If they
> intend
> to represent the DNSO, they should, at the very least, be responsive to the
> GA.  We have already submitted four questions to our Board candidates; here
> are some more... let's hope we get a few more replies...
>
> 1.   What are your thoughts regarding the decision of the ccTLD Constituency
>
> to withdraw from the DNSO?
>
> 2.   Board Resolution 01.28 asked for proposals that may result in changes
> in
> the structure of the DNSO and/or major changes in its functioning.  What
> proposals would you put forth?
>
> 3.   What is your position on current registrar transfer policies?
>
> 4.   What changes would you propose with respect to the UDRP?
>
> 5.   Do you support suspending the voting rights of financially delinquent
> constituencies?
>
> 6.   Small Business Owners account for perhaps 70% of all domain
> registrations yet this set of stakeholders does not appear to be
> well-represented in the ICANN process; how would you address this issue?
>
> 7.   The At-Large Study Committee was given a budget of $450,000 in order to
>
> accomplish outreach and generate recommendations; the DNSO is similarly an
> internal working committee of ICANN that engages in outreach and generates
> recommendations, but it has never been given any financial support by ICANN.
>
> Do you believe that the DNSO should continue to be self-funding?
>
> 8.   How would you evaluate the current TLD rollout?
>
> 9.   What comments would you make regarding ICP-3?
>
> 10.  It is now going on nine months since the new TLDs were selected and yet
>
> several registry contracts still remain to be signed; in view of the
> public's
> growing demand for new TLDs, how would you address this issue?
>
> 11.  As new TLDs are launched, the prospect of collisions in namespace
> grows;
> how do you propose to solve this problem?
>
> 12.  What is your position with respect to the future of .org?
>
> 13.  What is your position regarding the sale of Bulk WHOIS data?
>
> 14.  Is seven days sufficient time to review a registry contract?
>
> 15.  When would you begin the next round of TLD selections?
>
>
>
>

-- 
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
IT Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
Fax: (507) 230-3455
e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
http://www.sdnp.org.pa

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html