<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Additional Questions for our Board Candidates
Danny,
could I ask that we slow down just a bit and allow the endorsement period to get
started before demanding responses. I am sure that the candidates will be
responsive to an organized approach to consult with the constituencies and
GA.
However, I note that the nomination phase just closed,
and we are now in endorsement phase. Perhaps we could let that play out a few
days since that will be a useful exercise in and of itself.
I
understand that some may feel that they need to ask questions before endorsing,
of course, so I am merely suggesting that we, the GA, give it a few days
before appearing to set deadlines, or appear critical of the candidates for not
responding immediately.
Marilyn
It's time that we started hearing from our Board candidates.
If they intend
to represent the DNSO, they should, at the very
least, be responsive to the
GA. We have already submitted four
questions to our Board candidates; here
are some more... let's hope we get
a few more replies...
1. What are your thoughts regarding
the decision of the ccTLD Constituency
to withdraw from the DNSO?
2. Board Resolution 01.28 asked for proposals that may
result in changes in
the structure of the DNSO and/or major changes in its
functioning. What
proposals would you put forth?
3.
What is your position on current registrar transfer policies?
4. What changes would you propose with respect to the
UDRP?
5. Do you support suspending the voting rights of
financially delinquent
constituencies?
6. Small
Business Owners account for perhaps 70% of all domain
registrations yet
this set of stakeholders does not appear to be
well-represented in the
ICANN process; how would you address this issue?
7. The
At-Large Study Committee was given a budget of $450,000 in order to
accomplish outreach and generate recommendations; the DNSO is similarly an
internal working committee of ICANN that engages in outreach and generates
recommendations, but it has never been given any financial support by
ICANN.
Do you believe that the DNSO should continue to be
self-funding?
8. How would you evaluate the current TLD
rollout?
9. What comments would you make regarding ICP-3?
10. It is now going on nine months since the new TLDs were
selected and yet
several registry contracts still remain to be signed; in
view of the public's
growing demand for new TLDs, how would you address
this issue?
11. As new TLDs are launched, the prospect of
collisions in namespace grows;
how do you propose to solve this problem?
12. What is your position with respect to the future of .org?
13. What is your position regarding the sale of Bulk WHOIS data?
14. Is seven days sufficient time to review a registry contract?
15. When would you begin the next round of TLD
selections?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|