[ga] Re: Requesting Input from the Constituencies

["Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>]

The NCDNHC is on record as passing a resolution supporting the
creation of an individual domain name holders constituency.

See http://www.ncdnhc.org/docs/resolution/Stockholm/ST-VANY.html

>>> <DannyYounger@cs.com> 08/09/01 06:58AM >>>
Dear Names Council representatives,

The General Assembly is a cross-constituency meeting place.  Under discussion 
is an initiative to establish a new constituency to properly represent 
individuals.  It would be helpful to our discussions if we knew the position 
of each constituency regarding this matter.  We ask you to confer with your 
membership and to advise accordingly.  

At every plenary session of the Assembly, the constituencies are invited to 
speak to the Assembly and to report on issues and matters that concern the 
Internet community, the constituency, and the DNSO.  Such dialogue should 
occur not only at full sessions of the DNSO, but rather as required to deal 
with topics being evaluated.  Please consider this to be a formal invitation 
to now address the GA with respect to this initiative.   Your input will be 
highly valued and appreciated.

What position does your constituency take with regard to the establishment of 
a new constituency to better represent individuals?   We look forward to 
hearing your comments.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html