ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] GA/DNSO Funding Issues


On 20:54 27/08/01, Christian.Ahlert@sowi.uni-giessen.de said:
>So the chain is not broken -- it's simply different
>from a for-profit corporation with owners.

no-Member organizations were said "dead-hand" ownership in France at least.
They were abolished by the French revolution as dangerous for social 
stability, the current ownership being accountable to no one. Temple was 
dead hand.

In ICANN's case Users, Staff members and contractors as Jones Days and NSI 
have de facto longer terms than the "owners" making their objectives the 
ICANN objectives.

Jefsey



--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>