Re: [ga] Re: GA/DNSO Funding

[Mike Roberts <mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us>]

Rick -

This issue has been debated at length by the Board and executive 
staff.  The original CTO job was created by Jon for himself.   If he 
had lived, the relationship between the reservoir of technical smarts 
inside ICANN versus that resident in the PSO and its constituent 
organizations would have been quite different.

I think the Board and Stuart Lynn have an open mind about the future. 
There are those who prefer that ICANN defer to the PSO in technical 
areas, and there are others who feel that it should have a senior 
person.  At the present time, there is an opening for a senior 
systems manager that is under recruitment.  In another organization, 
it might be called CTO.  In ICANN, given the past, no one wants to 
seem to be putting on airs.

- Mike



At 17:21 -0700 8/27/01, Rick H Wesson wrote:
>Mike,
>
>upon review of the FY2001-2002 budget I note that there is no provision
>for a CTO. For a organization created for technical administration I am
>troubled that there are provision for more legal staff such as a
>Associate General Counsel or Policy Analysist but no current provision for
>a CTO.
>
>I understand that the CTO position was reserved for Jon; however, not
>staffing such an important role for a Technical body make it hard to
>believe that ICANN is designed for anything but Technical Administration.
>
>could you comment why a CTO wasn't placed while you were president?
>
>thanks,
>
>-rick
>
>Rick H Wesson
>CTO Registrars Constituency
>CEO Alice's Registry - An ICANN Accredited Registrar

-- 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html