ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force


On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 05:09:37PM +0000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> pre-Montevideo. What do GA members think? Does the idea of an ALSO obsolesce 
> the request for an IDNH Constituency?

No.  The existence (or not) of an SO in no way changes the necessity
for individual domain name holders to have a voice within the DNSO
formal structure.

the ICANN SOs and the formal structure of the DNSO are two separate
things.  SOs have little if any inreach into each others' processes
(e.g., the impact of the PSO or ASO on the normal business of the
DNSO).  It would be ill-advised to forsake an IDNH within the DNSO due
to the existence (or proposed existence) of another SO.

-- 
Mark C. Langston
mark@bitshift.org
Systems & Network Admin
http://www.bitshift.org
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>