Re[4]: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear WXW,
all this noise with your pen about the ccTLDs is leading you to where?
A part from showing you ignore everything there, what is your real target?

First thing you should put into your brain is that delegation is by the
ccTLDs to the ICANN. All your mails are just making ccTLDs less and
less interested in sharing into the DNSO/GA where you obviously do
not welcome them. Is that an intent you share with the ALSC? Bravo!

Jefsey



n 11:55 04/09/01, William X Walsh said:
>Tuesday, Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 2:34:28 AM, DPF wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 20:33:07 -0700, William X Walsh
> > <william@userfriendly.com> wrote:
>
> >>Perhaps Peter and Elisabeth could put up a web page describing some of
> >>the ccTLD related issues that they feel ICANN should be addressing,
> >>and then the GA, as a part of the DNSO (where those issues belong) can
> >>begin the process of developing recommendations and recommended policy
> >>to cover to them.
>
> > Here's my list - most of these have been sought for over two years
>
> > - root server performance contract (has take .nz over a year to get
> > our technical contact changed)
> > - Funding levels
> > - Clear re-delegation procedures
> > - Limitation on what sort of global policies can be forced onto ccTLDs
>
>All excellent issues, that certainly deserve attention.
>
>My point, however, is that it is difficult to accept the claim that
>the issues have been ignored when there has really been no effort from
>the ccTLD community to advance these issues in the process.  The first
>place to bring them is right here, and get some ideas, suggestions,
>and develop a consensus, which is then presented to the NC.
>
>I can say that the issues David has raised are certainly areas that
>ICANN needs to address.  I too have seen IANA/ICANN's failure with
>regard to both modifications in ccTLD records and redelegation
>requests and how they are effecting TLDs today.
>
>I know part of the problem here is that in the area of ccTLD
>delegation and redelegation, there is direct DoC oversight still in
>place on these areas of concern.  But perhaps if a coherent set of
>policy documents were developed and approved of from the bottom up,
>starting right here in the DNSO GA, where these issues belong, then
>the DoC may find that ICANN's policies in this area have developed
>enough, and with enough broad support, to warrant a release of the
>oversight to enable IANA/ICANN to implement more expeditious policies
>on these subjects.
>
>--
>Best regards,
>William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
>Userfriendly.com Domains
>The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
>DNS Services from $1.65/mo
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html