<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] We can't be against it?
"Exploiting a National Tragedy"
http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=388
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Marc Schneiders wrote:
> Yesterday ICANN announced (see www.icann.org) that the next meeting
> in MdR (LA) will be different and mainly devoted to security issues
> following the September 11 tragedies. Other topics on the agenda will
> probably be postponed.
>
> I am amazed not seeing any comment on this, here or elsewhere. Am I
> the only one who gets the funny feeling that there is something wrong
> here? Not that I am against the stability of the internet. But I would
> think that if there is one subject that is not really suited to deal
> with in an open transparent and bottom up process it is security
> measures. And nobody is against getting some root-servers.net out of
> Virginia into other parts of the world anyway.
>
> Now, I know, I may be in a very bad mood, because of Autumn, or
> something else, but I have this funny feeling, that this is an attempt
> to postpone some other serious issues, mainly the At Large, perhaps
> ..ORG, because certain people are uncomfortable with them.
>
> Please, tell me why I am mistaken!
>
>
--
Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's very hot and humid here.<--
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|