RE: [ga] Position Paper for your consideration

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

Regarding the ASO and PSO, in addition to Danny's comment suggesting that
the ASO and PSO have been functioning well, the ALSC also made a similar
statement in their draft report.  I would suggest that we really don't know
whether they are functioning well in the ICANN world because they have never
been tested.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter de Blanc [mailto:pdeblanc@usvi.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 8:28 PM
To: 'Jefsey Morfin'; ga@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [ga] Position Paper for your consideration


I would suggest a re-evaluation of the degree of representation on the
ICANN board (ASO and PSO), especially vis-a-vis the financial
contribution level, and the relative contributions to global Internet
(political) policy.

Peter de Blanc

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Jefsey
Morfin
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 5:03 PM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Position Paper for your consideration


On 19:06 30/09/01, DannyYounger@cs.com said:
>We agree with the assessment of the ALSC that the ASO and PSO, in 
>general, seem to be functioning well, and submit that there would be no

>apparent justification for any changes either in their structure or in 
>their degree of representation on the Board.

I am afraid, Danny, that I absolutely oppose that. PSO should only tell 
people the nr of the line their protocol has been recorded in. But
mission 
creep is here instead of cross-fertilization catalysis as we observe it.
We 
can say that the Internet protocols do not match the Internet
architecture 
in term of user autonomy and security. IRT ASO, the lack of education, 
concern and involvement of the Global Internet Community through @large
or 
a ASO/GA will probably result in a dramatic situation for real of
several 
magnitudes more important that the fake DNS debate. Billions of cost for

centuries, blocking of the Network, multiple BigBrothers, major
innovation 
delays, ...

So what we can say is that @large presence at SO through a GA is of the 
essence. An SO must be conceived as a governance structure with 
participating constituencies, council, GA, Secretariat, MLs, site,
etc...

Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html