RE: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: Peter de Blanc [mailto:pdeblanc@usvi.net]
|> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:12 AM
|> To: dassa@dhs.org; ; agenda@dnso.org
|> Subject: RE: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair
|>
|>
|> I am not imposing a majority. I am just saying (personally), as a NC
|> member, if there was a "ground swell" of consensus about a new GA chair,
|> I would be inclined to move to action on the NC.
|>
|> Certainly 1, or 2, or even 5 persons agreeing with WXW is not a "ground
|> swell", rough consensus, or anything like it.
|>
|> Peter de Blanc
<snip>
|> For the GA to do anything it needs an effective Chair.  That is one of
|> the issues and why the item is on the agenda one would assume.  It would
|> also be presumptive to impose a majority vote on such an issue in the
|> GA.

Please re-read my words above, I was not indicating you were imposing a
majority rule.  The operative words are "would" and "presumptive".  The NC
should be moved to action on any indication of discontent and
dissatisfaction.  The action would be qualified by the perceived need.  If
you wanted to use statistics, it would be easy to show this issue a major
topic and hence a matter that does need investigation.  Even 5 people over
the last few weeks expressing support would be high as the major posters
over the last few months have been very few.  From my own observation, the
numbers against have not been higher than the numbers suggesting it is an
issue worthy of consideration.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html