Re: [ga] The position of the GA? SYS

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

I note your list is not inclusive or exclusive.  Please Joanna and Jefsey and
Roeland  and WXW and Dr. Lovell take part.

May we delegate a sublist and may we appoint David Farrar as our chairman?  I do
believe Sys. is right

I offer the first proposition:

ICANN has contracted to support these concepts may we first explore mandatory
financing of such work.

Secondly may we change and parrot other groups papers.

Third, may we tie this into security and carry over into the current agenda
(strictly for political purposes)

Fourth, and optimum of all will people please contribute so that Brothers and
Sisters may be heard.

Sincerely,
Eric

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> So far there have been restructuring position papers put forth by the
> registrars, the business constituency, the gTLD registries, and the ALSC.
> The gTLDs have referenced the concept of the Open Forum (GA) in this
> statement:
>
> "If Supporting Organizations are created to reflect the views of particular
> groups, there should be some new cross-SO mechanism to facilitate inter-SO
> deliberation on policies that might affect various SOs and to generate
> documented consensus (on the basis of which the Board could take action)."
>
> The General Assembly membership should contribute to this debate as well.  I
> would ask those that have already shown an interest in this topic, Kent
> Crispin, David Farrar, Joop Teenstra, Ross Rader, and Tim Langdell, among
> others, to assist in leading a discussion that would result in a GA position
> paper.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html