ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] Task Force appointees


Tuesday, Tuesday, October 16, 2001, 3:17:36 PM, Joanna Lane wrote:

> on 10/15/01 5:58 PM, DannyYounger@cs.com at DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>> The Names Council has also established a Task Force to attend to the issue of
>> intra-registrar transfers.  Although we have not yet been asked to provide a
>> representative (probably an oversight), I am reasonably confident that such
>> an invitation will be forthcoming as this matter was brought to the attention
>> of the Council by the GA.
>> 
>> As this issue must also be dealt with in an expeditious manner, I also
>> consider it appropriate to appoint a representative to facilitate the rapid
>> resolution of outstanding issues.  For this Task Force we will need the
>> benefit of a representative with a passionate interest in the subject who has
>> demonstrated a commitment to registrant rights.    Accordingly,  I am asking
>> William Walsh to accept this responsibility, and to similarly chair a
>> committee that will discuss GA concerns relative to the transfers issue.
>> 
>> I would ask both David and William to confirm their appointments.

> I strongly object to the appointment of William Walsh in this position. He
> advocates only American Registrar views, vehemently objecting to any
> requests to consider the difficulties of non-US Registrars, and Registrants
> in general.

My letter on this subject to ICANN had signatures from NUMEROUS
European and even Asian ISPs.

You're full of it.

> He sees no need to consider, let alone, comply with EU laws to
> which EU Registrars and Registrants are subject and he advocates that ICANN
> should refuse to do business with all foreign Registrars that will not
> comply with American ways of doing business.

None of which has anything to do with the DOMAIN TRANSFER ISSUE.

> We need a person who will fight
> for removal of the bankrupcy clause from the Registrar transfer Agreement,

No, we need someone who will focus on the REAL issue right now, which
has nothing to do with that clause.

> which is the most nonsensical, unworkeable clause as any I have ever seen in
> any contract. We need somebody who represents the Registrants, not the
> Registrars, and William is not that person.

Get off it, I declined the nomination anyway, but your comments here
are way out of line, Joanna.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>