RE: [Idno-discuss] Re: [ga] IDNO -- SCHMIDNO.

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

On 23:45 16/10/01, Roeland Meyer said:
>|> From: PacificRoot Hostmaster [mailto:idno@tallship.net]
>|> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:34 PM
>
>|> As Vint said himself when cornered by distinguished Conressional
>|> representatives, "uh... we're only responsible for our root."
>|>
>|> That much is true - ICANN is central to nothing else.
>
>I might point out that even that statement is over-ambitious. ICANN isn't
>responsible for the root. It is only responsible for making recommendations
>for the root. The USDOC is the responsible authority. It is a small factoid
>that keeps getting glossed over.

Yes, but the USG root will absolutely be of no interest when Govnet has 
developed the proper alternative and forced Microsoft to integrate to 
Windows as part of its security scheme. As I told Stuart and Mike; when 
militaries comes in they usually open routes for heir own use that the 
civilians may use afterward.

Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html