Re: [ga] Ballot question

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>In accordance with the rules and procedures of the General Assembly, a motion 
>has been put forth, has been seconded, and after discussion has received the 
>benefit of a friendly amendment.  The Chair has determined that sufficient 
>consensus exists to move the matter forward to a ballot.  The Secretariat is 
>instructed to commence a vote of the General Assembly on the following ballot 
>question:
>
>
>Whereas the Domain Name Supporting Organization Formation Concepts (adopted 
>by the ICANN Board March 4, 1999), state that "The ICANN Board should 
>periodically review the status of the constituency groups to determine 
>whether all DNSO interests are adequately represented"
>
>Whereas members of the General Assembly have repeatedly expressed their 
>concern that the DNSO as currently constituted is not sufficiently 
>representative
>
>Whereas problems outlined by the DNSO Review have not been remedied 
>internally, and efforts undertaken by the Names Council have failed to 
>sufficiently address these concerns
>
>It is therefore
>
>RESOLVED that the ICANN Board be advised that:
>
>1.  Members of the General Assembly believe that DNSO dysfunctionality 
>requires direct ICANN Board intervention
>
>2.  The General Assembly seeks to establish a representative balance by being 
>placed on equal footing with the current DNSO Names Council and creating a 
>bicameral DNSO.
>
>3.  The General Assembly seeks initial budgetary/Secretariat support for the 
>DNSO/GA to perform its functions. 
>
>4.  The General Assembly will work with ICANN to develop an appropriate 
>funding model to support its activities.
>
>5.  The General Assembly seeks representation on the ICANN Board (to be 
>filled by a representative voting the recorded consensus of the DNSO/GA)
>
>6.  The General Assembly seeks to have both an Advocate and a Consensus 
>Leader, both elected positions of the DNSO/GA with budgetary control and 
>responsibility for all DNSO/GA staff.
>
>7. The General Assembly re-affirms the GA's commitment to the DNSO as 
>originally envisaged as a place for cross-constituency dialogue and 
>consensus building, and requests the Board to fulfil its obligation to 
>facilitate the entry of thus far unrepresented constituencies.
>
>[   X  ]  Agree
>[     ]  Disagree
>
Abstain?  Wouldn't think of it.

Forget burdening the Secretariat.  On the list, publicly, just as 
myself, Marilyn Cade, and Eric Dierker.  Cards on the table folks.  

>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>

-- 
Sincerely,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos

----------------------------
"It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, 
or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is 
actually in the arena; whose face is marred by the dust and sweat and blood; who strives 
valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, 
the great devotions and spends himself in a worthy course; who at the best, knows in the 
end the triumph of high achievement, and who, at worst, if he fails, at least fails while 
daring greatly; so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know 
neither victory or defeat."

-THEODORE ROOSEVELT
(Paris Sorbonne,1910) 



--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html