Re: [ga] Mr. Qaddafi Salutes Verisign

["John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>]

> You are right to say that ICANN IS currently governed by the law of USA.  I
> am saying that it SHOULD not be.

Then would you agree to reversing the result of every UDRP decision where a
non-US registrant was found to have engaged in cybersquatting on the basis of
a US trademark?

It would seem to be a relative no-brainer that if ICANN is going to engage
itself in establishing a policy relating to aspects of national civil law,
then ICANN should CERTAINLY have a higher priority for establishing a policy
relating to the CRIMINAL law of the United States.



--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html