Re: [ga] Objective of a GA member

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

those of you who know Rick know that he is an unbiased "straight shooter"
who calls it like it is.

what I see from his message is an honest appeal to the GA to "re-focus" and
get by all these personal insults and bickering from a person who sincerely
feels that something could be accomplished in this forum.

hopefully some of you will listen to him !

ken stubbs

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick H Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>
To: <eric@business.com.vn>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:43 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Objective of a GA member


>
> I think there is one question that was not asked that should have been,
>
>   11. Is the GA doing its job?
>
> IMNSHO, the GA could do great things, no matter what anyone else says. I
> see nothing but bickering from the GA; I hope the GA will stand and
> the interested will provide input into the process, no matter how broken
> ICANN is, when large groups of folks AGREE people listen; when a few loud
> mouths post alot of krap people just tune out and discount the entire GA.
>
> If you have ideas you want to see executed, collect the masses, write the
> documents; if you want to continue to disservice the GA post more krap.
>
> -rick
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Self serving I know to answer my own questions but otherwise cowardly,
> > please everyone answer so we can establish some values.
> >
> > Eric Dierker wrote:
> >
> > > 1.    Why are you monitoring?
> > >
> >
> > I find it intriguing and enlightening.  Even when kicked off the list I
> > monitored and engaged off list.  I believe this is my children's' future
> > and my fathers present.
> >
> > >
> > > 2.    Why do you participate?
> > >
> >
> > Because I may not be the sharpest tool in the shed but we have a place
> > also.  Man even my voice may impact some great person to do something
> > different.  And by the criticism I receive I learn
> >
> > >
> > > 3.    What do you expect of the GA?
> > >
> >
> > Be the guiding, (not governmental, not dictatorial, not ruling or
> > deciding) voice of common users of the Internet.
> >
> > >
> > > 4.    Name your four favorite GA participants.
> > >
> >
> > This is hard because I like so many and will forget a few.
> > Baptista-yes, Corliss, Berryhill, Kristy, Joanna, Namecritic, Joseph,
> > certainly Sotiris, Brett and Michael are in a group by themselves,
> > Flemming and Roberto.
> >
> > >
> > > 5.    Name your least favorite GA participants.
> > >
> >
> > Me, I post to much and don't get along with technocrats.
> >
> > >
> > > 6.    Are you in favor of the ALSC proposal?
> > >
> >
> > Humans versus DMNHs and 6 versus 9 should not be issues but I want to
> > move forward.
> >
> > >
> > > 7.    Do you want an IDNH So?
> > >
> >
> > Yesterday and last year are toooooo late.
> >
> > >
> > > 8.     Is staff doing a proper job?
> > >
> >
> > They have had an opportunity to do it right but refuse.  I know it is a
> > hard job but man they do it in a self interested way.  They get paid
> > enough to serve us so I think they should.
> >
> > >
> > > 9.    Is the BoD doing a proper job?
> > >
> >
> > I have been around this tree with Karl - what is their job?
> >
> > >
> > > 10.    Is the NC doing a proper job?
> > >
> >
> > No absolutely not.  No excuses, they are most responsible for blocking
> > the GA and bottoms up open and transparent consensus.  Can we recall
> > them?
> >
> > >
> > > Eric
> > >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html