Re: [ga] Objective of a GA member

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

You may be very correct, although research has shown the opposite.

However in fairness to all here and in objection to the failure of ICANN to
follow its' mandate.
And in further objection to the NCs' failure to promote a functioning GA.

I send my unsubscribe.

Sincerely,
Eric

Rick H Wesson wrote:

> I think there is one question that was not asked that should have been,
>
>   11. Is the GA doing its job?
>
> IMNSHO, the GA could do great things, no matter what anyone else says. I
> see nothing but bickering from the GA; I hope the GA will stand and
> the interested will provide input into the process, no matter how broken
> ICANN is, when large groups of folks AGREE people listen; when a few loud
> mouths post alot of krap people just tune out and discount the entire GA.
>
> If you have ideas you want to see executed, collect the masses, write the
> documents; if you want to continue to disservice the GA post more krap.
>
> -rick

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html