Re: [ga] The Network Solutions contribution to international terror

[Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

on 12/2/01 10:23 PM, Patrick Corliss at patrick@quad.net.au wrote:

> On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:06:54 -0800, William X Walsh wrote:
> 
> 
>> Sunday, Sunday, December 02, 2001, 3:55:39 PM, William S. Lovell wrote:
>>> But in any case, as internet inept as I may be, the question
>>> remains, has Network Solutions accepted money for which
>>> it provides a service to Hamas

Yes.
 
> <snip>
> 
>> In other words, you are making many assumptions, that are best left to
>> law enforcement officials who have the tools to see if in fact that is
>> the case.

There's nothing obvious about this?

<quote>
 
"Our operation today affirms the following:

1- It was a natural retaliation by a people slaughtered day and night and
whose dignity is being humiliated by the Zionist enemyıs war machine.

2- This is not the revenge for martyr Mahmoud Abu Hannoud and the other
martyrs and our Brigades will soon launch that revenge Inshaıallah.

3- The American administrationıs General did not come to the region to ask
the Zionists to evacuate our lands but rather came believing that our people
will be satisfied with less than liberation of their usurped lands Š he is
only dreaming. 

And it is a Jihad until either victory or martyrdom

Qassam Brigades
17th Ramadan 1422Ad
2/12/2001AD " </quote>

>> I'm of the opinion it would most likely turn out not to be the case.

Then VRSN/ NetSol must have donated www.palestine-info.com to Hamas.

>> We have many loons in this country who would get their sick thrills by
>> putting up sites like that one.

Yes, they're called Internet Service Providers.
 
<snip>
> I have never agreed with you more, William, than I do now.
> 
> If I am not mistaken Joanna Lane has already brought this to our attention.

Not me. John Berryhill is the expert. I questioned Stuart Lynn, who
responded that ICANN doesn't care who its Registrars sells Domain Names to.
See www.IcannWatch.org "Stuart Lynn tackles Home Defense".

> I also thought the GA agreed that ICANN should comply with the law.

The GA has never stated its formal position. You are confused. An open mike
question posed in the Registry/ Registrar session at MdR elicited a response
attempting to ridicule the question, then specific instances were cited,
including palestine-info.com. ICANN then issued a short statement that it
expected its Registrars to comply with the law, but neither the GA, nor
ICANN, have developed any anti-terrorist policies in relation to DN
Registration.
> 
> Personally, I think the DNS is enough of an emotive sinkhole.

Since when were Domain Names registered by known terrorist groups not a DNS
issue? 

On November 9, well before action was taken by ATT & BT to pull the plug on
Al-Barakaat's/ Somalia's internet connectivity, John Berryhill posted this
to the GA:-

<quote> "According to President Bush:

"Al Taqua and Al Barakaat raise funds for Al Qaeda. [...] They provide
terrorist supporters with Internet service...."

Do our terrorist fighters at ICANN want to tackle the issue of this domain
name registered through a Florida domain registrar:

www.somalirefreshment.com

"Somali Refreshment Company (SRC) is a member of Barakaat Group of Companies
and a share holding company. This group includes a telecommunication
company,
bank, and money transfer business."

And, sure enough, the Refreshment division of Al Barakaat is identified on
the recent terrorist update at www.ustreas.gov/ofac

Is anyone at ICANN interested in real terrorists and the domain name system
(or at least those purported to be real by the US government)? </quote>

To which I would add, that SRC is currently seeking an exclusive bottling
contract for Somalia for its carbonated drinks with an international
recognized brand. Do you think it is legal for a US Corporation to offer
them one? 

Question: If it is illegal for ATT & BT to provide Al Barakat with internet
connectivity, why is it legal for Network Solutions to sell them Domain
names?

Regards,
Joanna


> 
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

Regards,

Joanna



The URLs for Best Practices:
DNSO Citation: http://www.dnso.org/dnso/gaindex.html
(Under "Other Information Documents")

Part I: Introduction, Principles and Definitions
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BestPractices.html
Part II: Flow Chart
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BP-flowchart.pdf
(Access to the .pdf file requires installing the Adobe Acrobat
Reader, which is available for free down load at
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html.)
Part III - Time Line Guide
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BP-PartIII.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html