<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[2]: [ga] The Network Solutions contribution to international terror
Monday, Monday, December 03, 2001, 2:12:53 AM, Joanna Lane wrote:
> on 12/2/01 10:23 PM, Patrick Corliss at patrick@quad.net.au wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:06:54 -0800, William X Walsh wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Sunday, Sunday, December 02, 2001, 3:55:39 PM, William S. Lovell wrote:
>>>> But in any case, as internet inept as I may be, the question
>>>> remains, has Network Solutions accepted money for which
>>>> it provides a service to Hamas
> Yes.
Again, you jump to an assumption, and place a label on Network
Solutions for which you have nothing but the most flimsy proof.
Some would call that libelous.
>> <snip>
>>
>>> In other words, you are making many assumptions, that are best left to
>>> law enforcement officials who have the tools to see if in fact that is
>>> the case.
> There's nothing obvious about this?
> <quote>
No, there isn't.
>>> I'm of the opinion it would most likely turn out not to be the case.
> Then VRSN/ NetSol must have donated www.palestine-info.com to Hamas.
No, and again, you are jumping to conclusions based on the most flimsy
of evidence.
>>> We have many loons in this country who would get their sick thrills by
>>> putting up sites like that one.
> Yes, they're called Internet Service Providers.
Your contributions have really gone down hill lately, Joanna. This is
just further evidence of it.
Perhaps it is time for you to take a break.
> <snip>
>> I have never agreed with you more, William, than I do now.
>>
>> If I am not mistaken Joanna Lane has already brought this to our attention.
> Not me. John Berryhill is the expert. I questioned Stuart Lynn, who
> responded that ICANN doesn't care who its Registrars sells Domain Names to.
> See www.IcannWatch.org "Stuart Lynn tackles Home Defense".
ICANN shouldn't care. It is not their role or position.
It is up to the REGISTRARS to comply with the law.
> Question: If it is illegal for ATT & BT to provide Al Barakat with internet
> connectivity, why is it legal for Network Solutions to sell them Domain
> names?
No one is saying it is legal. But also, no one has proof that they
have.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Webcertificates.info
SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|