[ga] NC Review Task Force -- Captured by Business Interests ??

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Ross, 

If we were to use your argument that "Unless you are imply that these 62 
individuals are somehow representative of the other 454, it cannot be 
legitimately argued that the GA can achieve consensus on any issue", then 
your own constituency finds itself in a conundrum...

You recently voted on the transfers protocol, an issue in which some 40 
members voted out of the almost 200 registrars listed by ICANN (some 
accredited, some not).  Many in your organization seek to argue that this is 
the consensus position of the registrar community.  By your reasoning, the 
vote conducted by the registrars does not necessarily constitute consensus in 
view of the limited turnout... are you sure that you want to advance the 
argument along these lines?

Consensus can only be reasonably measured by taking into account the vote of 
those members actively choosing to participate in a vote.  Our members have 
voted.  The results speak for themselves.  We believe this to be measurable 
consensus.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html