ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] NC Chair elections


Are you sure the provision passed? The vote was 10 in favor, 9 against, 1
abstention, and 1 person failed to vote. That's not a majority of the NC,
only a majority of quorum. What is required to actually pass a change to the
NC's internal rules? (I don't know.)

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Up until today the Council had rules, and under them the Business
> Constituency had chaired the Council for its allotted period.  It was time to
> rotate.  Unfortunately for us, this did not sit well with the supporters of
> cronyism.  The Council has now changed the rules at the last minute to allow
> the BC to continue to chair.  This stinks.  It's reprehensible.  But it's
> what we have come to expect from the Council.
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>