Re: [ga] Re: [admin] Attacks and offensive words

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

For proper discourse that would be "Yes, Eric, it is how ...."
I find your use of the word "No" to be offensive and lacking in civil discourse.
You have caused me to lose face and that shame should be upon you and you should be
banned.

Funny but I think that is how about a billion people would read that.  What verbal
morals are in place?
Ack, it is all almost irrelevant as it can be routed around as sure the whole of
ICANN.

Eric

William X Walsh wrote:

> Tuesday, Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 3:23:02 AM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Your position is well noted as a debate stifler, control freak and censorship
> > advocate.
> > Only as you see how things should run should they run, great for a boss engineer
> > bad for consensus.
>
> No, Eric, it is how the GA said things should run, as we voted on.
>
> The rules are simple, and they are fair.  As to how they are
> implemented, that is something that could be open to debate, but the
> current action was called for, and justified.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> --
> Save Internet Radio!
> CARP will kill Webcasting!
> http://www.saveinternetradio.org/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html