[ga] Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] Internet is global=we need central planning

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Alejandro and all,

Alejandro Pisanty - DGSCA y FQ, UNAM wrote:

> Hi!
>
> even decisions for ccTLDs are not "not global". A well-accepted document
> such as RFC 1591 clearly states that the ccTLDs are run with a
> responsibility to the local and the global Internet community.

  Very true.  Now if only the ICANN BoD and staff would not have
abandon RFC 1591 with respect to gTLD's...

>
>
> The talk about decentralization to regional bodies need specify a lot
> better what is going to be decentralized, to at least make sense.
> Remembering again, that coordination is not central planning.
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Director General de Servicios de Computo Academico
> UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> Tel. (+52-55) 5622-8541, 5622-8542 Fax 5550-8405
> http://www.dgsca.unam.mx
> *
> ** 10 Aniversario de Internet Society - www.inet2002.org en Washington, DC
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isoc.org
>  Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>
> On Fri, 3 May 2002, James Love wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
> > > I do realize just how painful it is to move from general concept to
> > > concrete detail for technical details.  Perhaps that difference in our
> > > experience explains why I have so much respect for the requirement to
> > > provide meaningful detail.  And an understanding of the difference between
> > > meaninful detail and "every single detail one could possibly imagine."
> >
> >    I have a lot of respect for people who can figure out the details, and I
> > have confidence that decision makes should know how much detail to focus on
> > at any given time.    I could fully specify 18 different ways of resolving
> > uniqueness over TLD strings, from first come first service to UDRP type
> > ADRs, to systems that blocked dictionary names but not none dictionary
> > names, to regional allocations and regional bargaining over contested names,
> > to lotteries, and dozens of other approachs, all of which would work, and
> > work somewhat differently.     Or, we could have the ICANN board do this for
> > each TLD string, plus doing all sorts of other regulatory decisions for all
> > new gTLDs that will ever be authorized.
> >
> >    The decision to move things away from the ICANN board doing this is a
> > high level policy issue, which has its own logic.   The choice of the best
> > alternative isn't something that one needs to know right off the bat.  This
> > would benefit from debate.   To suggest it can only be done by the board is
> > nonesense.
> >
> > My preferred system is to have DNSO 1, the current one, and have new DNSO's
> > self organize for regions (such as for example Europe, one possibly for
> > spanish speaking countries, one for Africa, one for the Indian subcontient,
> > etc), and have the new ones take over the decisions that are not global,
> > such as checking out the qualifications of the operator, protecting
> > consumers, etc.     The group of DNSOs would then negotiate between each
> > other to resolve uniqueness issues, and possibly failing to resolve
> > differences between each other, the ICANN board could impose a (least
> > restrictive of entry) ADR to resolve disputes.  The ICANN board could also
> > insist on minimum policies on UDRP and whois, if it wanted to.
> >
> > Jamie
> >
> > --------------------------------
> > James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
> > http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss@icann-ncc.org
> > http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html