<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Text of the motion...
On 3 May 2002, at 18:34, William X Walsh wrote:
> Friday, May 03, 2002, 3:00:26 PM, jeanette hofmann wrote:
>
> > I support a rebid not because I expect the DOC to generate or
> > negotiate a better structure next time but rather because the
> > current ICANN structure lacks any form of accountability. Rebids
> > might be a way of compensating for this severe shortcoming. In the
> > unlikely case that we succeed in achieving a rebid, ICANN's
> > successor might be less indifferent with regard to proper procedure
> > and consensus assertions.
>
> Which is all fine and dandy, but the GA is not the proper vehicle for
> it.
According to its bylaws ICANN has no members. There is no
formally accepted At Large membership. What other channel for
expressing distrust would you suggest?
Moreover, in Accra I have lost the belief in the healing
power of substantive bottom-up structures within the current ICANN
framework.
jeanette
> All you would do is kill the GA permanently, with no chance of it
> being anything substantive from that point forward.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> --
> Save Internet Radio!
> CARP will kill Webcasting!
> http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|