<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Text of the motion...
Saturday, May 04, 2002, 8:17:00 AM, jeanette hofmann wrote:
> On 3 May 2002, at 18:34, William X Walsh wrote:
>> Friday, May 03, 2002, 3:00:26 PM, jeanette hofmann wrote:
>>
>> > I support a rebid not because I expect the DOC to generate or
>> > negotiate a better structure next time but rather because the
>> > current ICANN structure lacks any form of accountability. Rebids
>> > might be a way of compensating for this severe shortcoming. In the
>> > unlikely case that we succeed in achieving a rebid, ICANN's
>> > successor might be less indifferent with regard to proper procedure
>> > and consensus assertions.
>>
>> Which is all fine and dandy, but the GA is not the proper vehicle for
>> it.
> According to its bylaws ICANN has no members. There is no
> formally accepted At Large membership. What other channel for
> expressing distrust would you suggest?
Create a petition, form an organization, issue your own statements.
The GA is not the place for it.
> Moreover, in Accra I have lost the belief in the healing
> power of substantive bottom-up structures within the current ICANN
> framework.
So that makes it ok to destroy the GA for those who do not want to
give up on the GA, because you have lost belief?
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|