Re: [ga] Proposal for ballot text # 3

[Alexander Svensson <alexander@svensson.de>]

James,

I believe that you are adding confusion now. What we can 
vote on are *motions*, not hypothetical anti-positions
as "suggested ballot texts". Or is this really supposed
to be the second *motion* by James Love?

Regards,
/// Alexander
 

At 13.05.2002 09:10, James Love wrote:
>As indicated earlier, I support the following text to be included on the
>ballot, which would provide for a pro-BOD text, so that a range of views can
>be presented on the ballot.  I would personally vote against this text, but
>support its inclusion on the ballot.
>
>People who want to support Suggested Ballot Text # 3 should indicate so by
>24:00 pacific time today.
>
>====Suggested Ballot text # 3================
>"The GA wishes to express its confidence in the ICANN board of directors to
>address the reform process, and agrees with the general direction of the
>Committeee on ICANN reform work so far."
>======================================
>
>--------------------------------
>James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
>http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html