<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Proposal for ballot text # 3
And thus further confuse the issue by trying to make this appear to be
an either or question, either you support the board or you support the
cptech sponsored motion.
Nice political play, Jamie.
Monday, May 13, 2002, 6:10:04 AM, James Love wrote:
> As indicated earlier, I support the following text to be included on the
> ballot, which would provide for a pro-BOD text, so that a range of views can
> be presented on the ballot. I would personally vote against this text, but
> support its inclusion on the ballot.
> People who want to support Suggested Ballot Text # 3 should indicate so by
> 24:00 pacific time today.
> ====Suggested Ballot text # 3================
> "The GA wishes to express its confidence in the ICANN board of directors to
> address the reform process, and agrees with the general direction of the
> Committeee on ICANN reform work so far."
> ======================================
> --------------------------------
> James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
> http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|