<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Juliano vs. Lane
On 21:39 20/05/02, William X Walsh said:
>Monday, May 20, 2002, 12:32:17 PM, Joanna Lane wrote:
>
> > Look William,
> > Advocating for a special interest group is not the same thing as
> claiming to
> > represent them. I have never once claimed to represent anybody but myself,
> > and in fact, declined to sit on this Task Force as the GA Rep when invited
> > by Philip Shepard because I wanted to serve the user community exclusively,
> > which the GA Rep cannot do, since the GA also represents providers. The
> fact
> > that the DNSO does not have an Individual Domain Name Registrants
> > Constituency should not prevent us from arguing our case by whatever means
> > possible. That's all I was doing, so cut it out.
>
>And to do that, you need some credible basis for your positions being
>representative of the community you CLAIM your views would be serving.
>
>Did you have support from any organization that even purports to
>advocate on the behalf of those you were asking to be the voice for?
>
>The problem is that the only thing you had was your own assertion that
>your views would be in support of that community.
Apart from your bitterness on the matter that I do not understand, what
else had/have you to provide?
Would you have seated on that TF? Would you represent more than Joanna?
Joanna is a pure registrant. You are a reseller. I am a DNS operator. Dan
was a Registrars support. Jeff says he has no DN... I frankly do not
understand your position...
jfc
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/02
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|