<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] deletion policy - what should it look like?
perhaps we could begin by defining exactly what is meant by 'delete'?
* delete from the registry?
* delete from the registrar?
* be unable to renew the domain anymore even tho something might still
be temporarily 'live'?
Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
> One of the things which have come out of the TF calls is that there
> have been quite a few people calling for a uniform domain name
> deletion policy (which I hereby baptise UDNDP). What should this
> policy look like?
>
> Options:
>
> - Delete precisely N days after the date of expiry, at HH:00 UTC.
> - Delete between M and N days after date of expiry. (N - M = 7)
> - others?
>
> Comments welcome. While I don't believe that a deletion WG could
> actually get a full consensus policy done until Bucharest (as Danny
> suggested), producing a suggestion may still be worth the effort.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
Dan Steinberg
SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|